Journal Information
Vol. 23. Issue 5.
Pages 251-258 (September - October 2017)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
653
Vol. 23. Issue 5.
Pages 251-258 (September - October 2017)
Original article
Open Access
Analysis of sarcoidosis in the Oporto region (Portugal)
Visits
653
A.V. Cardosoa,
Corresponding author
car_veronica@sapo.pt

Corresponding author.
, P.C. Motab,c, N. Melob, S. Guimarãesd, C. Souto Mourad, J.M. Jesuse, R. Cunhae, A. Moraisb,c
a Pneumology Department, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal
b Pneumology Department and Diffuse Lung Disease Study Group, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal
c Faculty of Medicine of Porto University, Porto, Portugal
d Pathology Department, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal
e Radiology Department, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal
Related content
Rev Port Pneumol. 2017;23:247-810.1016/j.rppnen.2017.08.001
R.P. Baughman, E.E. Lower
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (4)
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of patients.
Table 2. Clinical presentations of sarcoidosis (respiratory and constitutional symptoms) and thoracic and extrathoracic involvement.
Table 3. Laboratory work-up results.
Table 4. Features of sarcoidosis in selected geographic areas.15,22–24,28,36–38,43,45
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Background

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease of unknown etiology. Epidemiological studies of different populations are essential because clinical presentation, organ involvement, disease severity, and prognosis vary significantly according to region and population. The aim of this study was to assess epidemiological and clinical characteristics, staging factors, and clinical course in patients with sarcoidosis from a tertiary hospital in Oporto, Portugal.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients with sarcoidosis and at least 2 years of follow-up evaluated at the Centro Hospitalar de São João between 2000 and 2014.

Results

We identified 409 patients with sarcoidosis (females, 58.9%; mean age at diagnosis, 38.9±13.4 years; smokers, 14.4%]. All the patients were diagnosed according to the ERS/ATS/WASOG consensus statement and 64.1% had evidence of noncaseating epithelioid cell granulomas in biopsy specimens. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed as part of the diagnostic work-up in 289 patients and 90.2% had lymphocytosis (CD4/CD8 ratio ≥3.5 in 60.9% of cases). Exertion dyspnea, cough, and constitutional symptoms were the most common presenting symptoms; 10.1% of patients were asymptomatic, 22.8% had Löfgren syndrome, and 50.5% had extrathoracic involvement. Radiographic stages of disease according to the Scadding criteria were as follows: stage 0 (5.2%), stage I (33.7%), stage II (47.0%), stage III (8.4%), and stage IV (5.7%). Impaired respiratory function was observed in 45.6% patients and was mostly mild. Systemic treatment was administered in 58.6% of cases. Overall, 45.3% of patients experienced disease resolution.

Conclusion

The epidemiological and clinical characteristics of this cohort of patients with sarcoidosis from the Oporto region in northern Portugal revealed epidemiological and clinical characteristics that were generally similar to those described in other Western Europe populations and in the US ACCESS study. However, we found a higher proportion of patients who progressed to chronic forms.

Keywords:
Sarcoidosis
Oporto
Löfgren syndrome
Extrathoracic involvement
Scadding criteria
Full Text
Introduction

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology characterized by the accumulation of macrophages and CD4+ T lymphocytes in involved organs. It is associated with the formation of noncaseating granulomas and mainly affects the lungs, lymph nodes, and skin.1,2 The prevailing hypothesis regarding the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis is that it is caused by various unknown antigens in genetically susceptible hosts and that these factors modulate both incidence and clinical phenotype.3,4

Sarcoidosis is diagnosed by clinical findings, chest radiographic or high-resolution computed tomography features, and a biopsy showing noncaseating granulomas.2,5–7 Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), which is a standard procedure in the diagnostic work-up of patients with diffuse lung disease, has also proven very useful, since a high CD4/CD8 ratio (>3.5) is considered to be highly specific (93–96%) for sarcoidosis and, when found in association with a typical clinical picture, may support the diagnosis and obviate the need for confirmation by additional procedures.8–10

The prevalence of sarcoidosis is estimated at between 15.3 and 21.7 cases per 100,000 population depending on the series and geographical location.11,12 The female to male ratio is between 1.2 and 1.5/1.12–15 About 70% of patients are 25–40 years old at the time of presentation.13,14,16 In some multiethnic populations, sarcoidosis is more prevalent in black people. In the USA, for example, it is four times more common in blacks than in whites.11

Clinical presentation, organ involvement, disease severity, and clinical course also vary significantly according to region and population.11–13,15,16 It is therefore of the utmost importance to accurately define the characteristics of the disease in each region in order to tailor diagnostic and treatment approaches appropriately. The purpose of the present study was to assess epidemiological characteristics, clinical presentation, staging factors, and clinical course in patients with sarcoidosis evaluated at a tertiary hospital in the north of Portugal.

Materials and methods

This study was designed and conducted by the Diffuse Lung Disease study group at the Centro Hospitalar de São João (CHSJ) in Oporto, Portugal. The CHSJ is a tertiary hospital that receives patients mostly from the Oporto district and the north of Portugal. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with a diagnosis of sarcoidosis and at least 2 years of follow-up seen at the CHSJ outpatient clinic between 2000 and 2014.

All the patients had been diagnosed in accordance with the consensus statement of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society/World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders (ATS/ERS//WASOG).4 The diagnosis was based on compatible clinical and radiological findings, supported by histological evidence of noncaseating granulomatous inflammation. The diagnosis was also assumed, even without histological confirmation, in patients with compatible clinical and radiographic features, BAL fluid CD4/CD8 ratio >3.5, and at least 2-year observation period to exclude other medical conditions. BAL was performed according to ERS recommendations, with appropriate processing and interpretation of specimens.17

Löfgren syndrome was defined as erythema nodosum combined with bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy on chest radiograph and frequent fever and ankle arthralgia.6 Thoracic involvement at the time of diagnosis was classified using the Scadding radiological criteria (stage 0, no intrathoracic involvement; stage I, bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy without lung involvement; stage II, bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy with lung involvement; stage III, lung involvement only; and stage IV, lung fibrosis).6

Additionally, the patients underwent lung function tests and ventilation patterns were classified as normal, obstructive, restrictive, or mixed according to the ERS/ATS Task Force criteria.18

All patients underwent a thorough physical examination to detect extrathoracic involvement, including a meticulous skin evaluation, cardiac auscultation, abdominal palpation, and a neurological examination. Cutaneous lesions suspicious for sarcoidosis were biopsied. The patients also underwent blood (peripheral blood counts, calcium, liver enzymes, creatinine, urea nitrogen, and angiotensin-converting enzyme) and urine analyses. The protocol also included a detailed ophthalmologic evaluation and electrocardiogram and transthoracic echocardiography. When these last exams showed changes or when cardiac symptoms were present, patients were referred for 24-h Holter monitoring and cardiac magnetic resonance (MR).

Extrathoracic involvement was assessed using the WASOG Sarcoidosis Organ Assessment Instrument,19 which classifies organ involvement as “highly probable”, “probable”, or “possible”. An organ was defined as involved with sarcoidosis if there was a “highly probable” or “probable” involvement. In the WASOG instrument the category “definitive organ involvement”, which is used in the ACCESS study (A Case Control Etiologic Study of Sarcoidosis),20,21 was replaced with “highly probable” because even histologic evidence of granulomatous inflammation is not definitive for a diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

In accordance with ATS/ERS//WASOG consensus statement,4 treatment was prescribed whenever patients presented significant symptomatic complaints, meaningful organ impairment and/or sustained disease progression.

Disease resolution was defined as disappearance of symptoms, normalization of chest X-ray findings and lung function, and, in the event of extrathoracic manifestations, regression of clinical, analytical, and/or imaging abnormalities within 2 years of diagnosis. Patients with evidence of disease after 2 years were considered to have chronic sarcoidosis.

Data were obtained through a chart review. The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS for Windows (version 19). Data were presented as mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables. The Student t test for independent samples was used to compare means of normally distributed variables and the Mann–Whitney U rank test was used to compare means of nonnormally distributed variables. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

The study was approved by the ethics committee at the CHSJ.

Results

A total of 409 patients with a diagnosis of sarcoidosis evaluated between 2000 and 2014 were included in our analysis.

Sociodemographic characteristics

The mean age at initial diagnosis was 38.9±13.4 years (Fig. 1). There were 241 (58.9%) females and 168 (41.1%) males and their mean age was similar (39.8±14.3 for women vs 37.8±11.8 years for men, P=0.118). The vast majority of patients were white (98.5%); 1.0% were blacks and 0.5% were mixed race. At time of the diagnosis, 14.4% of the patients were smokers and 10.1% were ex-smokers. The patients’ sociodemographic characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Age at diagnosis and sex distribution of patients.

(0.08MB).
Table 1.

Sociodemographic characteristics of patients.

Characteristics  Mean±SD or n/total (%) 
Age (years)  38.9±13.4 
Female  39.8±14.3 
Male  37.8±11.8 
Female  241/409 (58.9) 
Tobacco
Smoker  53/368 (14.4) 
Ex-smoker  37/368 (10.1) 
Never smoker  278/368 (75.5) 
Clinical presentation

Respiratory symptoms were mentioned as presenting symptoms by 59.2% of patients; the most common complaints were exertion dyspnea (44.2%) and dry cough (43.7%). Constitutional symptoms were observed in 42.2% of cases, and asthenia was particularly common (34.5%). Löfgren syndrome was the presenting clinical form in 22.8% of patients; 44.7% were female and 12.7% were male (P<0.001). At diagnosis, 10.1% of patients were asymptomatic and the disease was detected in a routine thoracic chest X-ray. Table 2 summarizes the clinical presentations.

Table 2.

Clinical presentations of sarcoidosis (respiratory and constitutional symptoms) and thoracic and extrathoracic involvement.

  n/total 
Respiratory symptoms  242/396  59.2 
Exertion dyspnea  175/396  44.2 
Cough  173/396  43.7 
Chest pain  46/396  11.6 
Sputum  38/396  9.6 
Wheezing  36/396  9.1 
Hemoptysis  4/396  1.0 
Constitutional symptoms  165/391  42.2 
Asthenia  135/391  34.5 
Arthralgia  94/391  24.0 
Weight loss  73/391  18.7 
Fever  53/391  13.6 
Myalgias  31/391  7.9 
Löfgren syndrome  89/391  22.8 
Asymptomatic  40/396  10.1 
Thoracic involvement  388/409  94.8 
Stage I  138/409  33.7 
Stage II  192/409  47.0 
Stage III  34/409  8.4 
Stage IV  23/409  5.7 
Extrathoracic involvement  196/388  50.5 
Skin  60/388  15.5 
Nonthoracic lymph node  55/388  14.2 
Eyes  53/388  13.7 
Liver  26/388  6.7 
Spleen  23/388  5.9 
Hypercalcemia/hypercalciuria  15/388  3.9 
Neurological  12/388  3.1 
Cardiac  10/388  2.6 
Bone  8/388  2.1 
Renal  4/388  1.0 
Thoracic involvement

Thoracic involvement was detected in 94.8% of patients (Table 2). Based on the Scadding criteria, the majority of patients had stage I (33.7%) or stage II (47.0%) disease; 8.4% had stage III disease and 5.7% had stage IV disease.

Of the 388 patients with available lung function data, 54.4% had normal ventilation patterns, 16.9% had small airway obstruction, 13.6% had a restrictive pattern, 11.6% had an obstructive pattern, and 3.6% had a mixed pattern. Of the 45 patients with an obstructive pattern, 11 (24.4%) had history of smoking habits, however, after a judicious evaluation, the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was not considered, and ventilatory changes were interpreted in the sarcoidosis context. Diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was slightly reduced in 47.6% of the 286 patients with available data.

Extrathoracic involvement

Extrathoracic involvement was observed in 50.5% of patients, 49.7% of whom were female and 52.2% of whom were male (P=0.58).

The most commonly affected organs were the skin (15.5%), the peripheral lymph nodes (14.2%), and the eyes (13.7%). From those with skin involvement, violaceous or erythematous maculopapular lesions were reported for 74.1% of patients and lupus pernio for 6.5%. Uveitis was the most common ocular manifestation of sarcoidosis (47.8% anterior and 20.5% posterior uveitis), followed by lacrimal gland involvement with onset of keratoconjunctivitis sicca syndrome (12.2%).

Potentially life threatening extrathoracic sarcoidosis, for example with cardiac and neurological involvement, were less common in this population, observed in 3.9% and 3.1% of the patients, respectively. Concerning neurological sarcoidosis (3.9%; n=12), 9 patients had mononeuropathy (6 with peripheral seventh nerve palsy – Bell's Palsy, 2 with optic nerve dysfunction, and 1 with peripheral mononeuropathy), 2 patients had hypothalamic involvement with diabetes insipidus and hypogonadism, and 1 patient developed acute aseptic meningitis. Regarding cardiac sarcoidosis (3.1%; n=8), 5 patients had frequent premature ventricular contractions and/or conduction system abnormalities and 3 patients had cardiomyopathy.

Frequencies of organ involvement are shown in Table 2.

Diagnostic work-up

Bronchoscopic evaluation was performed in 289 patients; 65.7% had normal endoscopic findings, 25.3% had mucosal hyperemia, and 9.0% had granular mucosa. Differential cell counts in BAL fluid were available for 246 patients; of these, 90.2% had lymphocytosis (CD4/CD8 ratio ≥3.5 in 60.9% of cases).

Serum angiotensin-converting enzyme levels were assessed in 267 patients, and 54.3% had levels above the upper limit of normal (70IU/L).

In the diagnostic work-up, 64.1% of patients had a biopsy showing evidence of noncaseating epithelioid cell granulomas in histological specimens. The respiratory tract, the skin, and the peripheral lymph nodes were the most frequently biopsied organs. The diagnostic work-up results are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3.

Laboratory work-up results.

Characteristics  Mean±SD or % 
BAL results
Lymphocytes (%)  42.8±18.9 
Lymphocytes>15%  90.2 
CD4/CD8 ratio  5.6±4.7 
CD4/CD8>3.5  60.9 
Neutrophils (%)  2.8±6.6 
Eosinophils (%)  0.89±1.5 
Elevated ACE (>70 UI/L)  54.3 
Histological specimens  64.1 
Bronchial biopsy  12.2 
Skin biopsy  9.8 
Transbronchial lung biopsy  7.6 
Peripheral lymph node biopsy  7.6 
Open lung biopsy  7.1 
EBUS-TBNA  6.4 
Transbronchial needle aspiration  3.2 
Mediastinoscopy  3.2 
Transthoracic biopsy  2.7 
Liver biopsy  2.4 
Others  4.4 

BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; EBUS-TBNA, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration.

Treatment and disease progression

Systemic treatment was prescribed to 58.6% of patients. Complete resolution of disease was documented in 45.3% of patients during clinical and radiological follow-up; 97% of these had Scadding stages 0, I, or II and 60.0% experienced spontaneous resolution. The remaining 54.7% of patients developed chronic disease (63.4% showed few changes over time and 36.6% developed progressive disease). Four patients were referred for lung transplantation: one underwent single lung transplantation, one was rejected because of severe cardiac failure, and two died of pulmonary fibrosis with respiratory failure while waiting for transplantation.

Discussion

Very different clinical phenotypes have been reported for sarcoidosis in terms of presentation, organ involvement, and outcome.4,13,21 In our cohort of patients from northern Portugal, we found that sarcoidosis had a peak incidence in middle-aged individuals and was predominant in females (58.9% of cases). Our findings coincide with previous reports for other Caucasian populations,4,11,12,22,23 in which sarcoidosis was more common in middle-aged adults, with a peak between 30 and 39 years. We found no age-related differences between male and female patients. Women have been found to be older than men in some populations12,24–26 and in some regions, such as Scandinavia and Japan, a bimodal age distribution has been described, with peaks between 25–29 and 65–69 years of age.12,24,27 Sarcoidosis was more common in women in our cohort, with a female to male ratio of 1.4:1. This female preponderance has been reported across racial and ethnic groups.15,28–31

As expected, the prevalence of smokers and ex-smokers (24.5%) was lower than in the general Portuguese population (39.0%),32 supporting the hypothesis that smoking appears to exert a certain protective effect against the occurrence of sarcoidosis.33,34

Thoracic involvement was observed for 94.8% of patients in our cohort and about half had concomitant extrathoracic disease. These rates are similar to those described in the literature, including those described in the ACCESS study of 736 sarcoidosis patients from the United States.15 The presenting symptoms of sarcoidosis are diverse and their respective incidence depends on epidemiological factors.35 The most common manifestations in our cohort were respiratory symptoms, constitutional symptoms, and Löfgren syndrome. Although almost all the patients had lung involvement, only 59.2% mentioned respiratory symptoms (mainly, exertion dyspnea and dry cough). In other studies, respiratory symptoms were reported by 70% of patients in the United States15 and 73.7% of patients in Turkey.25 In the Netherlands, dyspnea was the main complaint in 70% of patients studied.31 Interestingly, two studies of sarcoidosis populations in Lisbon (Portugal) and Leon (Spain), which share genetic similarities with the population in northern Portugal, reported respiratory symptoms in just 7.3% and 20.3% of patients, respectively.23,30 Constitutional symptoms (mainly asthenia) were present in 42.2% of patients in our cohort. This is higher than the respective rates of 10.2% and 26.5% reported for Leon30 and Lisbon23 and lower than those reported for the Netherlands (71%)31 and Turkey (50.5%).25 These discrepancies could be related to differences in methodology or in type of care center, as a tertiary referral hospital would logically have a higher caseload of patients with more severe forms of disease than a primary care center or an epidemiological study of the general population. Löfgren syndrome was the presenting clinical form in 22.8% of patients and it was more common in females (44.4% vs 12.7% for males, P<0.001). Löfgren syndrome is linked to the HLA DRB1*03 allele,35,36 whose distribution varies considerably according to geographic location.38 This syndrome was reported in about 50% of patients on diagnosis of sarcoidosis in Spain,30,38,39 compared with just 2%–6% in Japan38,40 and 8% in the United States.15 The incidence in our series is similar to that reported for Scandinavian countries.14,24,25 Surprisingly high rates of Löfgren syndrome have been described for sarcoidosis patients in Spain and almost half of the cases were diagnosed during the spring months.30,38,39,41 Female predominance is a common observation for Löfgren syndrome.35,42 Sarcoidosis was diagnosed fortuitously on chest X-ray in 10.1% of patients (all asymptomatic), supporting previous reports suggesting that this form of diagnosis is not uncommon.35,43

A majority of patients had radiographic stages I and II disease (33.7% and 47.0%, respectively) according to the Scadding criteria. These rates are consistent with those reported for different populations.4,13,15,23,26,30,39,40 Lung function tests are usually part of routine investigation.4 The most common lung abnormality in our cohort was decreased DLCO, observed in 47.6% of patients. Lung volumes were normal in over half of the patients and when present, impaired respiratory function was mostly mild. Similar findings were reported in the ACCESS study15 and a previous Portuguese study.23 Lung function abnormalities tended obviously to be more marked from stages I to IV, as reported by other studies.44

Approximately half of the patients had extrathoracic involvement, mainly affecting the skin, the peripheral lymph nodes, and the eyes, as previously reported.2,15 The low prevalence of neurologic and cardiac involvement is also in line with data reported for Caucasian populations.4 Cardiac sarcoidosis is significantly more common in Japanese patients than in either white or African Americans.38,40Table 4 shows a summary of the features of sarcoidosis by geographic area according to a selection of studies.15,22–24,28,36–38,43,45

Table 4.

Features of sarcoidosis in selected geographic areas.15,22–24,28,36–38,43,45

Features (%)  Our study (n=409)  Portugal – Lisbon (n=403)  Spain – Catalonia (n=245)  Spain – Leon (n=118)  West Germany and Switzerland (n=715)  Scandinavia (n=7674)  Turkey (n=293)  Japan (n=1027)  Singapore (n=59)  United States (n=736) (white/black) 
Ethnicity
White  98.5  93  ∼100  –  –  –  –  53.4 
Black          44.2 
Japanese          99.6 
Chinese          32.2 
Indian          49.2 
Other  0.5          0.4  18.6  2.4 
Respiratory symptoms  59.2  7.3  20.8  20.3  40.1  59a  73.3  36.4  40.6  70 
Constitutional symptoms  42.2  26.6  3.6  10.2  17.8    50.5  –  35.6  34 
Asymptomatic  10.1  20.1  12.7  33.7  41  –  26.2  33.9  – 
Löfgren syndrome  22.8  17.8  58.7  45.8  8.4  18  21.5  6.2  –  8.3 
Thoracic involvement
Stage 0  5.2  12  7.3  8.5  1.3  4.8  14.3  17.0  8.3 
Stage I  33.7  33  66.1  59.3  35  50  51.9  40.5  57.4  39.7 
Stage II  47  36  16.7  19.8  51  35  31.7  29.3  10.6  36.7 
Stage III  8.4  16  9.7  10  14  14 (Stage III and IV)  5.1  7.9  12.8  9.8 
Stage IV  5.7  –  3.4    0.7  8.1  2.1  5.4 
Extrathoracic involvement
Skin (excluding EN)  15.5  28.9  7.7  2.5  –  5.7  16  29.2  5.1  15.4 (13/19.7)d 
Peripheral lymph node  14.2  –  11.8  3.4  –  13  11.3  –  16.9  15.2 (12.2/19.4)d 
Eyes  13.7  15.8  14.2  3.4  –  16  3.1  54.8  8.5  11.8 (7.6/16.9)d 
Liver  6.7  –  8.5  –  –  5.9  3.8  5.7  8.5  11.5 (6.1/17.5)d 
Spleen  5.9  –  –  –  4.1  –  –  6.7 
Hypercalcemia/Hypercalciuria  3.9  –  –  0.8  –  5.3  –  7.4/6.4  11.9  3.7 (5.1/1.8)d 
Neurological  3.1  6.5  5.3  –  –  4.1b/0.9c  –  7.2  6.8  4.6 
Cardiac  2.6  –  –  –  –  –  23  –  2.3 
Bone  2.1  –  –  –  –  4.4  –  0.7  –  0.5 
Kidney  –  –  –  –  –  3.7  –  0.7 

EN, erythema nodosum.

a

Respiratory symptoms and/or extrathoracic symptoms.

b

Peripheral neuropathy.

c

Central nervous system.

d

Organ involvement in which there was a significant difference between white and black patients.

Sarcoidosis remains a diagnosis of exclusion that is best supported by a tissue biopsy that demonstrates noncaseating granulomas in a patient with compatible clinical and radiologic features.2,4 However, some studies have suggested that lymphocytosis and a high CD4/CD8 ratio in BAL fluid may be sufficient to confirm diagnosis in patients with typical clinical/radiological features of sarcoidosis. A CD4/CD8 ratio ≥3.5 has a specificity of 93%–96% for sarcoidosis, although its sensitivity is considerably lower, at 53%–59%.46,47 In the present study, noncaseating granulomas were histologically confirmed in about two-thirds of patients and a CD4/CD8 ratio ≥3.5 in BAL fluid was observed in 60.9%.

Previous studies have reported spontaneous remission in nearly two-thirds of patients and chronic or progressive disease in 10%–30%.12,13,29,43 Approximately half of the patients in our cohort developed chronic forms of sarcoidosis, but only a third of these experienced disease progression. The higher proportion of chronic forms detected may be related to the fact that the cohort corresponded to patients from a tertiary care setting. This possible exclusion of less severe forms of sarcoidosis is a potential limitation of our study.

Several other limitations need to be mentioned. First, the retrospective design meant that not all data were available for all patients and also that we were missing certain data that could have shed light on the etiology of sarcoidosis (e.g., occupational and environmental exposures). Second, the study was not designed to capture all patients in our geographic area, and therefore we cannot comment on the overall incidence/prevalence of sarcoidosis in our region. Third, comparisons with findings from other studies also have potential pitfalls related to temporal and selection biases. Some of the variability between countries could be explained by differences in health beliefs or health-seeking behaviors (e.g., presence or not of chest X-ray screening programs for tuberculosis, primary, secondary or tertiary care centers context).

Conclusion

We have presented the first report of sarcoidosis cases in northern Portugal. In general, the epidemiological and clinical characteristics observed have similarities to those described for other Western European populations. However, we found a higher proportion of patients who progressed to chronic forms which is probably related with the fact that the study had been carried out in a tertiary university center. This study could become also a baseline for other epidemiological studies in Portugal about sarcoidosis. We believe that the population in the South of the country, with some genetic discrepancies and the presence of a black African community, could have different disease presentation, severity and evolution that would be interesting to make comparisons with. Indeed, large-scale multicenter studies are needed to gain more insight into the influence of ethnicity and geography on the incidence and clinical course of sarcoidosis.

Ethical disclosuresProtection of human and animal subjects

The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data

The authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work center on the publication of patient data.

Right to privacy and informed consent

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Funding source

No funding was obtained from any commercial or pharmaceutical companies. Funding for this study was supported by private donations.

Detail of authorship contributions

All listed authors participated in the study conception, in the data acquisition/analysis and in the writing of the article.

Conflict of interest declaration

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References
[1]
S. Nureki, E. Miyazaki, M. Ando, T. Ueno, T. Fukami, T. Kumamoto, et al.
Circulating levels of both Th1 and Th2 chemokines are elevated in patients with sarcoidosis.
Respir Med, 108 (2008), pp. 239-247
[2]
M.C. Iannuzzi, B.A. Rybicki, A.S. Teirstein.
Sarcoidosis.
N Engl J Med, 357 (2007), pp. 2153-2165
[3]
P.C. Mota, A. Morais, C. Palmares, M. Beltrão, N. Melo, A.C. Santos, et al.
Diagnostic value of CD103 expression in bronchoalveolar lymphocytes in sarcoidosis.
Resp Med, 106 (2012), pp. 1014-1020
[4]
American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society/World Association Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders.
Statement on Sarcoidosis.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 160 (1999), pp. 736-755
[5]
U. Costabel, G.W. Hunninghake.
ATS/ERS/WASOG statement on sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Statement Committee. American Thoracic Society. European Respiratory Society. World Association for Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders.
Eur Resp J, 14 (1999), pp. 735-737
[6]
R.P. Baughman, D.A. Culver, M.A. Judson.
A concise review of pulmonary sarcoidosis.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 183 (2011), pp. 573-581
[7]
B. Bradley, H.M. Branley, J.J. Egan, M.S. Greaves, D.M. Hansell, N.K. Harrison, et al.
Interstitial lung disease guideline: the British Thoracic Society in collaboration with the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand and the Irish Thoracic Society.
Thorax, 63 (2008), pp. v1-v58
[8]
U. Costabel, A.W. Zaiss, J. Guzman.
Sensitivity and specificity of BAL findings in sarcoidosis.
Sarcoidosis, 9 (1992), pp. 211-214
[9]
R.H. Winterbauer, J. Lammert, M. Selland, R. Wu, D. Corley, S.C. Springmeyer.
Bronchoalveolar lavage cell populations in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.
Chest, 104 (1993), pp. 352-361
[10]
F. Reichenberger, B. Kleiber, B. Baschiera, L. Bubendorf, M. Brutsche, P. Dalquen, et al.
Bronchoalveolar lavage quality influences the T4/T8 ratio in sarcoidosis.
Respir Med, 101 (2007), pp. 20125-20130
[11]
B.A. Rybicki, M. Major, J. Popovitch, M.J. Maliarik Jr., M.C. Ianuzzi.
Racial differences in sarcoidosis incidence: a five year study in a health maintenance organization.
Am J Epidemiol, 145 (1997), pp. 234-241
[12]
G. Hillerdal, E. Nou, K. Osterman, B. Schmekel.
Sarcoidosis: epidemiology and prognosis.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 130 (1984), pp. 29-32
[13]
L.E. Siltzbach, D.G. James, E. Neville, J. Turiaf, J.P. Battesti, O.P. Sharma, et al.
Course and prognosis of sarcoidosis around the world.
Am J Med, 57 (1974), pp. 847-852
[14]
E. Neville, A.N. Walker, D.G. James.
Prognostic factors predicting the outcome of sarcoidosis: an analysis of 818 patients.
Q J Med, 52 (1983), pp. 525-533
[15]
R.P. Baughman, A.S. Teirstein, M.A. Judson, M.D. Rossman, H. Yeager Jr., E.A. Bresnitz, Case Control Etiologic Study of Sarcoidosis (ACCESS) Research Group, et al.
Clinical characteristics of patients in a case control study of sarcoidosis.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 164 (2001), pp. 1885-1889
[16]
R.L. Mayock, P. Bertrand, C.E. Morrison.
Manifestations of sarcoidosis: analysis of 145 patients with a review of nine series selected from the literature.
Am J Med, 35 (1963), pp. 67-89
[17]
Technical recommendations and guidelines for bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL).
Report of the European Society of Pneumology Task Group.
Eur Respir J, 2 (1989), pp. 561-585
[18]
R. Pellegrino, G. Viegi, V. Brusasco, R.O. Crapo, F. Burgos, R. Casaburi, et al.
ATS/ERS Task Force: standardisation of lung function testing – interpretative strategies for lung function tests.
Eur Respir J, 26 (2005), pp. 948-968
[19]
M.A. Judson, U. Costabel, M. Drent, A. Wells, L. Maier, L. Koth, et al.
The WASOG sarcoidosis Organ Assessment Instrument: an update of previous clinical tool, 31 (2014), pp. 19-27
[20]
M.A. Judson, R.P. Baughman, A.S. Teirstein, M.L. Terrin, H. Yeager Jr..
Defining organ involvement in sarcoidosis: the ACCESS proposed instrument. ACCESS Research Group. A case control etiologic study of sarcoidosis.
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Ling Dis, 16 (1999), pp. 75-86
[21]
M.A. Judson.
Extrapulmonary sarcoidosis.
Semin Respir Cit Care Med, 28 (2007), pp. 83-101
[22]
L.S. Newman, C.S. Rose, L.A. Maier.
Sarcoidosis.
N England J Med, 336 (1997), pp. 1224-1234
[23]
M. Aguiar, M. Felizardo, A. Mendes, R. Sotto-Mayor, A. Almeida.
Characterization of patients with sarcoidosis.
Rev Port Pneumol, 11 (2005), pp. 30-31
[24]
R.P. Nilman, O. Selroos.
Pulmonary sarcoidosis in the Nordic countries 1950–1982: epidemiology and clinical picture.
Sarcoidosis, 7 (1990), pp. 50-57
[25]
G. Kiter, B. Musellim, E. Çetinkaya, H. Turker, A.E. Kunt Uzaslan, E. Yenturk, et al.
Clinical presentations and diagnostic work-up in sarcoidosis: a series of Turkish cases (clinics and diagnosis of sarcoidosis).
Tuberculoz ve Toraks Dergisi, 59 (2011), pp. 248-258
[26]
R. Loddenkemper, A. Kloppenborg, N. Schoenfeld, H. Grosser, U. Costabel.
Clinical findings in 715 patients with newly detected pulmonary sarcoidosis: resultas of a cooperative study in former west Germany and Switzerland. WAL satudy Group: Wissenschaftliche Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur die Therapie von Lungenkrankheiten.
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis, 15 (1998), pp. 178-182
[27]
K.E. Byg, N. Milman, S. Hansen.
Sarcoidosis in Denmark 1980–1994. A registry-based incidence study compromising 5536 patients.
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis, 20 (2003), pp. 46-52
[28]
M.A. Judson, B.W. Thompson, D.L. Rabin, J. Steimel, G.L. Knattereud, Lackland, et al.
The diagnostic pathway to sarcoidosis.
Chest, 123 (2003), pp. 406-412
[29]
C.E. Henke, L.R. Elveback, C.M. Beard, D.J. Ballard, L.T. Kurland.
The epidemiology of sarcoidosis in Rochester, Minnesota: a population-based study of incidence and survival.
Am J Epidemiol, 123 (1986), pp. 840-845
[30]
S. Fernández González, R. López González.
Epidemiology, presentation forms, radiological stage and diagnostic methods of sarcoidosis in the area of Leon (2001–2008).
Rev Clin Esp, 211 (2011), pp. 291-297
[31]
R.M. Wirnsberger, J. de Vries, E.F. Wouters, M. Drent.
Clinical presentation of sarcoidosis in The Netherlands an epidemiological study.
Neth J Med, 53 (1998), pp. 53-60
[32]
A. Machado, R. Nicolau, C. Matias Dias.
Consumo de tabaco na população portuguesa: análise dos dados do Inquérito Nacional de Saúde 2005/2006: Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge (INSA).
Departamento de Epidemiologia – Instituto Nacional de Sau¿de Dr. Ricardo Jorge, (2009),
[33]
L.S. Newman, C.S. Rose, E.A. Bresnitz, M.D. Rossman, J. Barnard, M. Frederick, et al.
A case control etiologic study of sarcoidosis: environmental and occupational risk factors.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 170 (2004), pp. 1324-1330
[34]
J. Douglas, W.G. Middleton, J. Gaddie, G.R. Petrie, Y.F. Choo-Kang, R.J. Prescott, et al.
Sarcoidosis: a disorder commoner in non-smokers?.
Thorax, 41 (1986), pp. 787-791
[35]
H. Nunes, P. Soler, D. Valeyre.
Pulmonary sarcoidosis.
[36]
J. Grunewald.
HLA associations and Löfgren's syndrome.
Expert Rev Clin Immunol, 8 (2012), pp. 55-62
[37]
A. Morais, H. Alves, B. Lima, L. Delgado, R. Goncalves, S. Tafulo.
HLA class I and II and TNF-alpha gene polymorphisms in sarcoidosis patients.
Rev Port Pneumol, 14 (2008), pp. 727-746
[38]
O.P. Sharma.
Sarcoidosis around the world.
Clin Chest Med, 29 (2008), pp. 357-363
[39]
E. Fité, J.M. Alsina, Y. Maná, R. Puyol, J. Ruiz, J. Morera.
Epidemiology of sarcoidosis in Catalonia: 1979–1989.
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis, 13 (1996), pp. 153-158
[40]
T. Morimoto, A. Azuma, S. Abe, J. Usuki, S. Kudoh, K. Sugisaki, et al.
Epidemiology of sarcoidosis in Japan.
Eur Respir J, 31 (2008), pp. 372-379
[41]
A. Atanes, J. de Toro, N. Gómez, B. Aspe, J. Grana, J.M.S. Burson, et al.
Estudio de 94 casos de sarcoidosis con especial referencia al eritema nudoso.
Rev Clin Esp, 191 (1992), pp. 65-70
[42]
P. Spagnolo, E.A. Renzoni, A.U. Wells, H. Sato, J.C. Grutters, P. Sestini, et al.
C-C chemokine receptor 2 and sarcoidosis: association with Lofgren's syndrome.
AM Respir Crit Care Med, 168 (2003), pp. 162-166
[43]
J.P. Lynch, E.A. Kazerooni, S.E. Gay.
Pulmonary sarcoidosis.
Clin Chest Med, 18 (1997), pp. 755-785
[44]
R.A. De Remee, H.A. Andersen, S.E. Gay.
Sarcoidosis: a correlation of dyspnea with roentgenographic stage and pulmonary functionulmonary sarcoidosis with special reference to pulmonary function.
Mayo Clin Proc, 49 (1974), pp. 142-145
[45]
D. Anantham, S.J. Ong, K.L. Chuah, S. Fook-Chong, A. Hsu, P. Eng.
Sarcoidosis in Singapore: epidemiology, clinical presentation and ethnic differences.
Respirology, 12 (2007), pp. 355-360
[46]
U. Costabel, A. Zaiss, D.J. Wagner, R. Baur, K.H. Ruhle, H. Matthys.
Value of bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocyte subpopulations for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.
Sarcoidosis and other granulomatous disorders, pp. 429-432
[47]
M. Thomeer, M. Demedts.
Predicitive value of CD4/CD8 ratio in bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis, 14 (1997), pp. 36
Copyright © 2017. Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia
Pulmonology
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?